Protection of IB-MECA against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is not mediated by the A(1) adenosine receptor

Citation
E. Kodani et al., Protection of IB-MECA against myocardial stunning in conscious rabbits is not mediated by the A(1) adenosine receptor, BAS R CARD, 96(5), 2001, pp. 487-496
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
ISSN journal
03008428 → ACNP
Volume
96
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
487 - 496
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-8428(200109)96:5<487:POIAMS>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine whether the protective effects of t he A(3)AR agonist N-6-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide (IB-ME CA) against myocardial stunning are mediated by the AAR. Six groups of cons cious rabbits underwent a sequence of six 4-minute coronary occlusion (O)/4 -minute reperfusion (R) cycles for three consecutive days (days 1, 2, and 3 ). In vehicle-treated rabbits (group I), the recovery of systolic wall thic kening (WTh) in the ischemic/reperfused region was markedly depressed on da y 1, indicating the presence of severe myocardial stunning. On days 2 and 3 , however, the recovery of systolic WTh was markedly accelerated, indicatin g the presence of late ischemic preconditioning (PC). When rabbits were pre treated with the A,AR agonist 2-chloro-N-6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA, 100 mug/kg i.v.) or with IB-MECA (100 mug/kg i.v.) 10 min prior to the first se quence of O/R cycles on day 1 (group III and V, respectively), the recovery of systolic WTh was markedly accelerated compared to vehicle-treated anima ls (reflected as an similar to 48 % decrease in the total deficit of systol ic WTh). The magnitude of the protection afforded by adenosine receptor ago nists was equivalent to that provided by late ischemic PC. Pre-treating rab bits with the A(1)AR antagonist N-0861 completely blocked both the hemodyna mic and the cardioprotective effects of CCPA (group IV). However, the same dose of N-0861 did not block the cardioprotective actions of IB-MECA (group VI). Importantly, N-0861 did not influence the degree of myocardial stunni ng in the absence of PC (group II) and it did not block the development of late ischemic PC. Taken together, these results provide conclusive evidence that the cardioprotective effects of IB-MECA are not mediated via the A(1) AR, supporting the concept that activation of A(3)ARs prior to an ischemic challenge provides protection against ischemia/reperfusion injury.