Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and nonpatients
A. Wells et K. Carter, Further tests of a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder: Metacognitions and worry in GAD, panic disorder, social phobia, depression, and nonpatients, BEHAV THER, 32(1), 2001, pp. 85-102
Advances in treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are likely to resul
t from a better understanding of the dysfunctional cognitive mechanisms und
erlying persistent worrying. In a cognitive model of GAD, Wells (1995) prop
osed that pathological worry is maintained by maladaptive metacognitions (n
egative beliefs about worry concerning uncontrollability and danger, and ne
gative appraisal of worrying [meta-worry]) and linked behaviors. Twenty-fou
r patients with GAD were compared with sex-matched groups-social phobia, pa
nic disorder, and nonpatients-on measures of negative metacognitions and wo
rry. It was hypothesized that patients with GAD would obtain higher negativ
e metacognitive belief scores and higher meta-worry scores than the other g
roups; differences in negative metacognitions would be independent of the g
eneral frequency of worry. A group of individuals with major depression was
also examined as a subsidiary exploration of relative metacognitive and wo
rry characteristics of this disorder. All of the hypotheses were upheld in
the univariate ANOVAs. There was a loss of one hypothesized significant dif
ference between the GAD and panic disorder groups in meta-worry when genera
l worry frequency was controlled. However, the GAD group still had higher m
eta-worry scores than the panic group. This effect appears to be the result
of patients with panic having intermediate meta-worry scores falling betwe
en the GAD and other groups. Differences between the GAD group and all othe
r groups in negative metacognitive beliefs concerning uncontrollability and
danger remained when general worry was controlled. The results add further
support to the cognitive model, and treatment implications are briefly dis
cussed.