Engraftment syndrome in breast cancer patients after stem cell transplantation is associated with poor long-term survival

Citation
Sa. Khan et al., Engraftment syndrome in breast cancer patients after stem cell transplantation is associated with poor long-term survival, BIOL BLOOD, 7(8), 2001, pp. 433-438
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology
Journal title
BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
10838791 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
433 - 438
Database
ISI
SICI code
1083-8791(2001)7:8<433:ESIBCP>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
An autoaggression graft-versus-host (GVHD)-like syndrome or engraftment syn drome (ES) presenting with skin rash, fever, and other clinical findings ca n accompany the early phase of engraftment after autologous peripheral bloo d stem cell (PBSC)/bone marrow (BM) transplantation. Because ES was suggest ed to be analogous to GVHD, we have investigated whether ES was associated with any graft-versus-tumor effect that would affect disease progression an d survival in breast cancer patients. Eighty-five consecutive patients who received BM/PBSC transplantation for breast cancer (stages II-IV) between J uly 1991 and July 1997 with minimum 2-year follow-up were studied. Median f ollow-up time was 892 days (range, 106-2913 days). Thirty-three patients (3 9%) developed ES. The incidence of relapse/progressive disease for the whol e cohort was 61% and was similar in patients who developed ES compared with those who did not. However, there was an increased rate of mortality obser ved among the patients who had developed ES versus those who had not, altho ugh it was statistically not significant, (52% versus 31%, respectively; lo g rank, P=.08). Increased mortality rates due to disease progression were s een in all patients with ES regardless of their disease stage. In relapsed patients, median survival time after transplantation was 586 days for those with ES versus 847 days for those without ES, and the mortality rate was 8 5% (17/20) versus 51% (16/31) (P=.008) for those with or without ES, respec tively. Visceral (lung, liver, brain, adrenal) or multiple-site relapses we re observed in 85% of patients with ES versus 52% without ES (P=.01). In co nclusion, whereas there was no effect of ES on relapse rate, a surprisingly significant increase in disease-related mortality rates among relapsed bre ast cancer patients with ES was found. Thus, patients with ES should be con sidered for close follow-up and further therapy posttransplantation.