Until 1987, the notification rate for mycobacterial infection was on the de
cline; however, it now appears to be increasing once more. The reason for t
his may be multifactoral and include improved reporting of diagnosed cases,
increased infection of an ageing population, homelessness, immunosuppressi
on (e.g. due to human immunodeficiency virus infection), and immigration of
people from countries where tuberculosis is endemic. This rising incidence
and the increasing importance of resistant organisms mean that rapid ident
ification by the clinical microbiology laboratory is required, and this is
where an automated detection system can be an advantage. Over a two-year pe
riod, 2743 clinical specimen were examined for Mycobacterium spp. using the
Bactec' MGIT (TM) 960, and 286 were positive. Time to detection ranged fro
m three to 14 days (mean: 9.3 days), and M. tuberculosis was recovered from
214 (75.5%). Contamination rate was higher (8.6%) than with manual methods
, however. On balance, the Bactec (R) MGIT (TM) 960 system proved a valuabl
e tool in the routine microbiology laboratory.