This article highlights the role played by commercial life insurance compan
ies in determining the response to tuberculosis in Britain between 1865 and
1920. Late-Victorian life offices hired two sorts of physicians to help th
em screen out high-risk proposals: provincial medical examiners, who collec
ted fees for examining candidates; and salaried medical advisors, who devel
oped guidelines for the medical examination and interpreted the examiners'
findings for the head office. The latter set of physicians, many of whom wo
rked at specialist consumption hospitals in London, established all orthodo
xy among life offices that privileged hereditarian explanations for the cau
se of tuberculosis. The provincial examiners resisted that orthodoxy, argui
ng that advances in public health and treatment rendered irrelevant any app
arent correlation between family history and tuberculosis. In adjudicating
this internal dispute, life offices stood by their salaried advisors, but i
n the process pushed them away from viewing disease in terms of specific ca
uses and toward viewing disease in terms of statistical correlation. This v
ictory of statistics over etiology preserved, at least for the rest of the
twentieth century, the institutional prominence of insurance as a technique
for coping with medical uncertainty.