Four points are made about globalization and health. First, economic integr
ation is a powerful force for raising the incomes of poor countries. In the
past 20 years several large developing countries have opened up to trade a
nd investment, and they are growing well - faster than the rich countries.
Second, there is no tendency for income inequality to increase in countries
that open up, The higher growth that accompanies globalization in developi
ng countries generally benefits poor people, Since there is a large literat
ure linking income of the poor to health status, we can be reasonably confi
dent that globalization has indirect positive effects on nutrition, infant
mortality and other health issues related to Income. Third, economic integr
ation can obviously have adverse health effects as well: the transmission o
f AIDS through migration and travel is a dramatic recent example. However,
both relatively closed and relatively open developing countries have severe
AIDS problems. The practical solution lies in health policies, not in poli
cies on economic integration. Likewise, free trade in tobacco will lead to
increased smoking unless health-motivated disincentives are put in place, G
lobal integration requires supporting institutions and policies. Fourth, th
e international architecture can be improved so that It Is more beneficial
to poor countries. For example, with regard to intellectual property rights
, it may be practical for pharmaceutical innovators to choose to have intel
lectual property rights in either rich country markets or poor country ones
, but not both. In this way incentives could be strong for research on dise
ases in both rich and poor countries.