Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calciumchannel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension - The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) trial
Rb. Devereux et al., Effects of once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calciumchannel blockade-based antihypertensive treatment regimens on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic filling in hypertension - The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) trial, CIRCULATION, 104(11), 2001, pp. 1248-1254
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background-The Prospective Randomized Enalapril Study Evaluating Regression
of Ventricular Enlargement (PRESERVE) study was designed to test whether e
nalapril achieves greater left ventricular (LV) mass reduction than does a
nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system by a prognostically meaningful
degree on a population basis (10 g/m(2)).
Methods and Results-An ethnically diverse population of 303 men and women w
ith essential hypertension and increased LV mass at screening echocardiogra
phy were enrolled at clinical centers on 4 continents and studied by echoca
rdiography at baseline and after 6- and 12-month randomized therapy. Clinic
al examination and blinded echocardiogram readings 48 weeks after study ent
ry in an intention-to-treat analysis of 113 enalapril-treated and 122 nifed
ipine-treated patients revealed similar reductions in systolic/diastolic pr
essure (-22/12 versus -21/13 nun Hg) and LV mass index (-15 versus -17g/m(2
), both P>0.20). No significant between-treatment difference was detected i
n population subsets defined by monotherapy treatment, sex, age, race, or s
everity of baseline hypertrophy. Similarly, there was no between-treatment
difference in change in velocities of early diastolic or atrial phase trans
mitral blood flow. More enalapril-treated than nifedipine-treated patients
required supplemental treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (59% versus 34%, P
<0.001) but not atenolol (27% versus 22%, NS).
Conclusions-Once-daily antihypertensive treatment with enalapril or long-ac
ting nifedipine, plus adjunctive hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol when need
ed to control blood pressure, both had moderately beneficial and statistica
lly indistinguishable effects on regression of LV hypertrophy.