Mechanism of ventricular defibrillation for near-defibrillation threshold shocks - A whole-heart optical mapping study in swine

Citation
N. Chattipakorn et al., Mechanism of ventricular defibrillation for near-defibrillation threshold shocks - A whole-heart optical mapping study in swine, CIRCULATION, 104(11), 2001, pp. 1313-1319
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CIRCULATION
ISSN journal
00097322 → ACNP
Volume
104
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1313 - 1319
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(20010911)104:11<1313:MOVDFN>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background-To study the mechanism by which shocks succeed (SDF) or fail (FD F) to defibrillate, global cardiac activation and recovery and their relati onship to defibrillation outcome were investigated for shock strengths with approximately equal SDF and FDF outcomes (DFT50). Methods and Results-In 6 isolated pig hearts, dual-camera video imaging was used to record optically from approximate to 8000 sites on the anterior an d posterior ventricular surfaces before and after 10 DFT50 biphasic shocks. The interval between the shock and the last ventricular fibrillation activ ation preceding the shock (coupling interval, CI) and the time from shock o nset to 90% repolarization of the immediate postshock action potential (RT9 0) were determined at all sites. Of 60 shocks, 31 were SDF. The CI (59+/-7 versus 52+/-6 ms) and RT90 (108+/-19 versus 88+/-8 ms) were significantly l onger for SDF than FDF episodes. Spatial dispersions of CI (36+/-5 versus 3 4+/-3 ms) and RT90 (40+/-16 versus 40+/-8 ms) were not significantly differ ent for SDF versus FDF episodes. The first global activation cycle appeared focally on the left ventricular apical epicardium 78+/-32 ms after the sho ck. Conclusions-For near-threshold shocks, defibrillation outcome correlates wi th the electrical state of the heart at the time of the shock and on RT. Gl obal dispersion of RT was similar in both SDF and FDF episodes, suggesting that it is not crucial in determining defibrillation outcome after DFT50 sh ocks.