Ve conclude this case conference by describing the similarities and differe
nces between the respondents' comments. Regarding similarities, we highligh
t the focus on the contextual approaches to assessment and treatment of the
referral concerns, the limited reliance on psychodiagnostic information fo
r treatment development, the minimal attention paid to Mike's potential his
tory of sexual abuse, and the scientist-practitioner nature of the recommen
dations. Differences noted are more limited and include the attention paid
to the use of standardized assessment approaches, and the importance of soc
ial anxiety as a response Pattern of concern.