In this commentary we offer a critique of the task devised by Hermans (2001
): the PPR (Personal Position Repertoire). We first emphasize the important
contributions made by Hermans and collaborators toward improving our under
standing of the dialogical self, and then analyze several problems raised b
y this new method of studying the self. The issues we address are: the mean
ing of the concept of prominence; the possible reification of the positions
adopted in this task; and the problem of the power differential between cl
ients and psychologists.