Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins

Citation
R. Maymon et al., Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome after assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins, HUM REPR, 16(9), 2001, pp. 1999-2004
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
HUMAN REPRODUCTION
ISSN journal
02681161 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1999 - 2004
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-1161(200109)16:9<1999:NTMAPO>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nuchal translucency (NT) measurement for Down's syndrome screen ing or detecting various fetal anomalies is a reliable sonographic marker. This study evaluates the contribution of NT screening in spontaneously conc eived and assisted conception twin pregnancies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Matern al age at measurement, chorionicity, ultrasound features, karyotype results and pregnancy outcome were recorded prospectively and compared in 83 assis ted reproduction treatment and 91 spontaneously conceived twins. Pregnancy outcome was evaluated according to maternal age, method of conception, NT d ata and chorionicity. NT measurements (greater than or equal to 95 centiles of the normal range) were considered screen-positive and mid-pregnancy fet al karyotyping was advised. Complicated pregnancy outcome, which could be s ignalled by increased NT, was defined as either chromosomal abnormalities, severe structural defects or fetal demise. Based on NT measurements, 16 fet uses (4.6%) were found to be screen-positive. Five of them had chromosomal aneuploidy and selective termination was performed. The parents also opted for this procedure in another five fetuses because of major structural abno rmality diagnosed during NT assessment. No other chromosomal or major fetal abnormality were found post-natally. Although no difference was found in N T, crown-rump length and maternal age between spontaneous and assisted repr oduction technology twin pregnancies, the former group had a significantly higher rate of screen-positive results (7 versus 2%, P=0.047), amniocentesi s uptake (33 versus 22%, P=0.014), monochorionic twining (32 versus 4%, P=0 .001) and complicated pregnancy outcome (11 versus 5%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that first trimester target scanning can improv e outcome by early detection and management of cases with an anomalous co-t win. It also identifies some differences between spontaneously and artifici ally conceived twin pregnancies in relation to this area of testing.