Different risks of symptomatic brain necrosis in NPC patients treated withdifferent altered fractionated radiotherapy techniques

Citation
Ym. Jen et al., Different risks of symptomatic brain necrosis in NPC patients treated withdifferent altered fractionated radiotherapy techniques, INT J RAD O, 51(2), 2001, pp. 344-348
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
344 - 348
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(20011001)51:2<344:DROSBN>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Purpose: To report our observation of excessive temporal lobe necrosis in n asopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated with 160 cGy b.i.d. radiothe rapy technique. During the same period, patients treated with 120 cGy b.i.d . have not shown a similar tendency. Our experience may be useful for desig ning unconventional radiotherapy regimens for NPC patients. Methods and Materials: During the period from October 1991 to January 1998, 81 MO, previously untreated NPC patients completed altered fractionated ra diotherapy. Seventy patients were treated with the hyperfractionated techni que, and 11 were treated using the accelerated-hyperfractionated scheme. Hy perfractionated radiotherapy was delivered using 120 cGy b.i.d. separated b y 6-h intervals throughout the course. A minimum tumor dose of 8000 cGy was the standard dose over an 8-week period. With the accelerated-hyperfractio nated scheme, 160 cGy was given twice daily, also with an interval of 6 h. The minimum tumor dose ranged between 6840 and 7640 cGy, with 7 of the 11 p atients receiving 7000 cGy. The arrangement of portals was the same for bot h regimens. The follow-up period for patients alive was from 32 to 102 mont hs with a median of 61 months for the hyperfractionated patients. For the a ccelerated-hyperfractionated group, it ranged from 67 to 82 months with a m edian of 72 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Results: At the time of analysis, 49 of the 70 patients in the hyperfractio nated group were alive. In the accelerated group, 8 of the 11 patients were alive. The estimated radiation dose to the temporal lobe for the hyperfrac tionated group was 6000-7440 cGy with a median of 7080 cGy. For the acceler ated-hyperfractionated group, the dose range was 4480-6700 cGy with a media n of 6400 cGy. Of the 70 patients treated with hyperfractionated radiothera py, none developed symptomatic brain necrosis, despite the higher total dos e to the temporal lobe in general. In contrast, 3 of the 11 (27%) patients irradiated using the accelerated-hyperfractionated regimen suffered from te mporal lobe necrosis at 16, 19, and 40 months after completion of radiother apy. Conclusion: An excessive incidence of temporal lobe necrosis was noted when an accelerated-hyperfractionated regimen with 160 cGy b.i.d. was used in N PC patients with a median brain dose of 6400 cGy. There has been no such ev ent in patients treated using a hyperfractionated regimen with 120 cGy and a median brain dose of 7000 cGy. The real causes of this discrepancy are no t known. However, a high sensitivity of the human brain to a change in frac tion size may play a role. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.