Low-density lipoprotein size, pravastatin treatment, and coronary events

Citation
H. Campos et al., Low-density lipoprotein size, pravastatin treatment, and coronary events, J AM MED A, 286(12), 2001, pp. 1468-1474
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
ISSN journal
00987484 → ACNP
Volume
286
Issue
12
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1468 - 1474
Database
ISI
SICI code
0098-7484(20010926)286:12<1468:LLSPTA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Context Small low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size has been hypothes ized to be a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Animal models li nk large LDL to atherosclerosis. However, the strong association between sm all LDL and other risk factors, particularly triglyceride levels, impedes d etermining whether LDL size independently predicts CHD in humans. Objective To examine whether LDL size is an independent predictor of recurr ent coronary events in patients with known CHD, as opposed to a marker for other lipid abnormalities. Design and Setting Prospective, nested case-control study in the Cholestero l and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial, a randomized placebo-controlled trial of pravastatin conducted in 1989-1996. Participants Survivors of myocardial infarction with typical LDL concentrat ions (416 cases and 421 controls). Main Outcome Measure Subsequent myocardial infarction or coronary death dur ing the 5-year follow-up, analyzed by quintile of LDL particle size and by treatment group. Results Overall, the mean LDL size was identical in cases and controls (25. 6 nm). In patients in the placebo group, large LDL predicted coronary event s in models adjusted only for age (relative risk [RR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.17) and for age and lipid and nonlipid risk factors (RR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.81-8.82), comparing those in the highest (mean, 26.6 n m) and lowest (mean, 24.5 nm) quintiles of LDL size. This increased risk wa s not present in those taking pravastatin (age-adjusted analysis: RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.47-2.04; P = .046 for interaction for a difference in the effect of LDL size on coronary events between the placebo and treatment groups; m ultivariable analysis: RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.52-3.38; P = .11 for interaction ). Conclusions Large LDL size was an independent predictor of coronary events in a typical population with myocardial infarction, but the adverse effect was not present among patients who were treated with pravastatin. Identifyi ng patients on the basis of LDL size may not be useful clinically, since ef fective treatment for elevated LDL cholesterol concentrations also effectiv ely treats risk associated with large LDL.