M. Sato et al., COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF LINGUAL AND FACIAL-NERVE STIMULATION ON INTRACRANIAL AND EXTRACRANIAL VASOMOTOR RESPONSES IN ANESTHETIZED CATS, Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 182(2), 1997, pp. 103-113
Electrical stimulaion of the central cut end of the lingual nerve (as
reflex activation of parasympathetic nerve) or of the peripheral cut e
nd of the facial (VIIth cranial) nerve (as direct activation of parasy
mpathetic nerve) elicited the ipsilateral blood flow increases in lowe
r lip, palate and common carotid artery (CCA) but not in frontal cereb
ral cortex in alpha-chloralose-urethane anesthetized, vago-sympathecto
mized cats. No significant difference, in terms of the vasomotor chang
es examined, was found between lingual nerve and facial nerve stimulat
ion. The results suggest that there is no somato-parasympathetic refle
x vasodilator mechanism serving the frontal cerebral cortex, and that
changes in CCA blood flow should not be taken to be indicative of bloo
d flow changes in cerebrocortical blood flow. However, me cannot entir
ely rule out the possibility of a neurogenic vasodilator influence of
the facial pathway, since small blood flow increases in the frontal ce
rebral cortex mere sometimes observed on facial nerve stimulation. (C)
1997 Tohoku University Medical Press.