G. Licciardello et al., AMLODIPINE VS NIFEDIPINE - A CROSSOVER STUDY OF EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE ANGINA-PECTORIS, Clinical drug investigation, 13, 1997, pp. 119-125
A randomised crossover study was conducted to compare the efficacy and
tolerability of amlodipine with that of slow release nifedipine in pa
tients with stable exertional angina. After a 1-week drug washout phas
e, 48 patients were treated for 4 weeks with amlodipine (5 to 10mg onc
e daily) or slow release nifedipine (20 to 40mg twice daily) and then
crossed over to the alternative regimen; dosages were titrated to resp
onse within the dose range allowed. Both drugs were effective in contr
olling cardiac ischaemia, as evidenced by a reduced incidence of angin
al episodes (reported by patients and observed with Holter monitoring)
and increased exercise tolerance. From the results of bicycle stress
tests, both drugs appeared to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption dur
ing dynamic exercise by limiting the increase in heart rate; these fin
dings were also confirmed by heart rate and systolic blood pressure de
terminations. Patients who received amlodipine during the second treat
ment phase showed arterial pressures similar to those achieved with sl
ow release nifedipine, but heart rates were lower. In contrast, patien
ts treated with amlodipine during the first phase experienced a furthe
r reduction in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate when subse
quently treated with nifedipine; however, these results require additi
onal confirmation. The incidence of adverse events was also lower duri
ng treatment with amlodipine than with nifedipine. In conclusion, amlo
dipine has an efficacy and tolerability profile that is at least as go
od as that of slow release nifedipine in the treatment of patients wit
h stable angina pectoris.