Time to revision is an important criterion describing the quality of implan
ts in total joint surgery. Estimates of failure probabilities are required
to inform a patient about the risk of suffering a reoperation. Also, regres
sion models are used for comparing different prosthesis designs. Typically,
patients dying before a revision are considered as censored for time to pr
osthesis failure. We argue that this technique is inadequate for estimation
of failure probabilities and insufficient for comparison of different desi
gns. We propose a new approach based on a competing risk model to account f
or concurrent mortality. We describe differences in the estimation of failu
re probabilities and in the interpretation of regression models for implant
failure. Additionally, we introduce a random effects term in the regressio
n model to account for potential dependencies in the failure times of bilat
erally treated patients. The new approach is illustrated with fictitious da
ta and data from an observational study conducted at a specialized hospital
in Switzerland. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.