Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of dilated common bile duct

Citation
Y. Songur et al., Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of dilated common bile duct, J CLIN GAST, 33(4), 2001, pp. 302-305
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01920790 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
302 - 305
Database
ISI
SICI code
0192-0790(200110)33:4<302:EUITEO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Abdominal ultrasonography (US) is the procedure of first choice in the eval uation of a dilated common bile duct (CBD). Dilated bile ducts and the leve l of obstruction can be reliably demonstrated with US, but the cause can be determined in only two thirds of patients. The aim of this prospective stu dy was to assess the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (BUS) in detecting the cause of CBD dilatation in patients in whom US could not demonstrate t he cause of dilation or in whom US revealed equivocal results. This 13-mont h study included the evaluation of 985 patients. Ninety consecutive patient s found to have an enlarged CBD (diameter, greater than or equal to7 mm) of unexplained origin during US examination were included in this study. All patients were evaluated by BUS. Final diagnosis was determined by endoscopi c retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without sphincterotomy (n=72) and surgical exploration (n=17). The following diagnoses, were made by BUS : choledocholithiasis in 40 patients, benign distal stricture in 8, choledo chal cyst in 2, and ova of Ascaris in 1. The dilatation of CBD was found by BUS examination to be caused by a tumor in 13 cases. These included tumor of the papilla of the Vater in six patients, distal cholangiocarcinoma in f ive, and pancreatic head cancer in two. Endoscopic ultrasonography provided an accurate explanation for CBD dilatation in 70 of the 76 patients (92%). We conclude that the diagnostic strategy for cholestasis should include US as a first choice. When the diagnosis of biliary obstruction remains proba ble, BUS should be carried out. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogra phy with sphincterotomy should be reserved for therapeutic use rather than diagnostic.