Frequencies of births that were reported for specific days of the month wer
e documented for US dairy cattle born since 1987 by birth year, herd size,
and registry status and compared with calving frequencies for those dates.
Because birth dates are expected to be random and uniformly distributed thr
oughout each month, percentages of births on individual dates were expected
to be equal (3.3% for d 1 to d 28, 3.2% for d 29, 3.0% for d 30, and 1.9%
for d 31). However, percentages of reported birth dates for d 1, 2, 10, 15,
and 20 were higher than expected. The percentage of reported births for d
1 was highest (5.3%) of all days of the month regardless of herd size or re
gistry status. The nonuniform distribution of birth dates within month indi
cated that a substantial number of birth dates were unknown and that estima
ted birth dates had been reported. About one-third of the birth dates recor
ded on d 1 appeared to have been estimated, or altered to gain an advantage
in cattle shows. The highest frequencies for birth dates on d 1 (5.9 to 7.
4%) were found for registered cows during months that initiated age groupin
gs for dairy shows (March, June, September, and December). Birth dates for
some registered cows were intentionally misreported as confirmed by compari
son of birth dates of individual cows with calving dates of their dams. Rep
orted calving dates appeared to be more accurate than reported births; the
inflated frequency of recorded calvings on d 1 was only about 30% as large
as the inflated frequency of recorded births. Because cow age is determined
by birth date, proper reporting of birth dates is important to ensure the
accuracy of standardized yield and fitness records and the genetic evaluati
ons that are based on those records. When animals' recorded birth dates and
their dams' calving dates differ, more credence should be given to the lat
ter to improve accuracy.