Interference between related items in the identification of objects was exa
mined using a postcue procedure. Pairs of objects were presented as differe
ntly colored line drawings followed by a color cue to indicate which object
to name. Naming latencies were longer when both objects were from the same
superordinate category than when they were unrelated. This interference ef
fect was replicated when subjects were cued to report the color of a drawin
g rather than its name. Interference was greatly reduced when more distinct
ive attributes were used to distinguish members of a pair, both when the ta
sk required naming an object and when it required report of an object's att
ribute. These results challenge accounts of interference in the postcue par
adigm that are based on competitive interactions in the activation of phono
logical representations by semantics and instead implicate object-attribute
integration in memory as the source of interference.