In 4 category cued recall experiments, participants falsely recalled nonlis
t common members, a semantic confusion error. Errors were more likely if cr
itical nonlist words were presented on an incidental task, causing source m
emory failures called episodic confusion errors. Participants could better
identify the source of falsely recalled words if they had deeply processed
the words on the incidental task. For deep but not shallow processing, part
icipants could reliably include or exclude incidentally shown category memb
ers in recall. The illusion that critical items actually appeared on catego
rized lists was diminished but not eradicated when participants identified
episodic confusion errors post hoc among their own recalled responses; part
icipants often believed that critical items had been on both the incidental
task and the study list. Improved source monitoring can potentially mitiga
te episodic (but not semantic) confusion errors.