Ultrasound to decontaminate heavy metals in dredged sediments

Citation
Jn. Meegoda et R. Perera, Ultrasound to decontaminate heavy metals in dredged sediments, J HAZARD M, 85(1-2), 2001, pp. 73-89
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Engineering & Energy
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
ISSN journal
03043894 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
73 - 89
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-3894(20010730)85:1-2<73:UTDHMI>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Sediments contaminated with heavy metals due to past disposal practices thr eaten the environment and require remediation. This study was an attempt to develop a technology to decontaminate heavy metals in dredged sediments us ing ultrasound coupled with vacuum pressure. A set of laboratory scale expe riments were conducted using dredged sediments obtained from New York/New J ersey harbor. This sediment sample is considered as category III, a materia l that failed to meet USEPA requirements for toxicity or bioaccumulation, a nd required secure disposal. Acoustic cavitation due to ultrasound energy c oupled with vacuum pressure was used to facilitate the removal of chromium (the selected metal contaminant) from the sediments. Full factorial experim ental designs were performed to evaluate the above treatment technique and to optimize the processes. Two coupled processes were used to separate and to treat both coarse (Process #1) and fine (Process #2) fractions of sedime nts. Selected variables for evaluation of Process #1 were ultrasound power, soil-to-water ratio, vacuum pressure and dwell time, and for Process #2 we re ultrasound power, soil-to-water ratio and dwell time. Laboratory scale e xperiments were carried out with various combinations of these parameters a ccording to the factorial design. The optimum removal was found to be 92% w ith the parameter levels at 1200 W power, 1:15 soil-to-water ratio, 15 psi vacuum pressure and 15 min of dwell time. After the application of Process #2 for fine sediments it was found that the fines were separated into silt and clay. Only the silt faction had a considerable metal removal while the clay fraction was insensitive to the treatment. A maximum removal of 83% wa s obtained for silt fraction when factor levels were at 1200 W power, 1:50 soil-to-water ratio and 90 min of dwell time. Further analysis of clay frac tion showed that the chromium in clay is immobile and stable. The toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) test on clay fraction confirmed th at the treated clay fraction is safe to dispose. The study showed that the proposed treatment technique is effective and economical for sediments with lower clay contents. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V All rights reserved.