Comparison of thermally driven circulations from a depth-coordinate model and an isopycnal-layer model. Part II: The difference and structure of the circulations

Authors
Citation
Yg. Park et K. Bryan, Comparison of thermally driven circulations from a depth-coordinate model and an isopycnal-layer model. Part II: The difference and structure of the circulations, J PHYS OCEA, 31(9), 2001, pp. 2612-2624
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences","Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY
ISSN journal
00223670 → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2612 - 2624
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3670(200109)31:9<2612:COTDCF>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Thermally driven ocean circulations in idealized basins are calculated with two well-known model codes. one based on depth-level coordinates and the o ther based on isopycnal coordinates. In addition, the two models have very different representations of convection. In the level-coordinate model. con vective adjustment is used, while in the isopycnal-coordinate model. convec tion is simulated by a transformation of the surface layer to the layer bel ow. Both models indicate a three-layer structure in the circulation. The lo wer and middle layers have a flow structure that corresponds with the class ical abyssal circulation models. The upper flow is strongly constrained by the buoyancy flux field at the upper surface and the convective parameteriz ation. The model with convective adjustment and level coordinates is domina ted by an eastward flow, which sinks to subsurface level at the eastern bou ndary. It lacks any indication of a surface cyclonic flow, even in the vici nity of sinking at the northern wall. On the other hand, in the model based on density coordinates the eastward surface flow turns to the north at the eastern boundary and forms a pronounced cyclonic circulation at high latit udes. Due to the cyclonic circulation, the coldest surface water is found n ear the northwestern corner, while in the level model the coldest water is near the northeastern corner. The isopycnal model appears to be a more real istic representation of the real ocean since both wind and the thermohaline circulation are thought to contribute to the North Atlantic subarctic cycl onic gyre. Although the zonally averaged buoyancy flux produced by the two model codes is the same. the actual patterns of buoyancy flux at the surface are not s imilar at high latitudes. This suggests that the two types of numerical mod els would indicate very different air-sea interaction if coupled to atmosph eric models and used to simulate climate. The application of the Gent-McWil liams parameterization of mesoscale eddies to the model with z coordinates and convective adjustment reduces the differences between the surface circu lation of the two models by a small amount.