Echocardiographic imaging of technically difficult patients in the intensive care unit: Use of Optison in combination with fundamental and harmonic imaging
Gk. Daniel et al., Echocardiographic imaging of technically difficult patients in the intensive care unit: Use of Optison in combination with fundamental and harmonic imaging, J AM S ECHO, 14(9), 2001, pp. 917-920
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Previous studies of intravenous contrast agents have excluded patients in t
he intensive care unit. These patients remain among the most technically di
fficult to image with ultrasound. We studied the effect of different imagin
g modalities with and without intravenous contrast (Optison) on endocardial
border visualization during echocardiography. Fifty patients in the intens
ive care unit (32 men, 24 on mechanical ventilator, 10 with chest bandages;
mean age, 59 years; mean weight, 91.7 kg; mean height, 67.6 inches) were c
onsidered to have technically difficult images when the endocardium could n
ot be visualized in at least 2 of the 6 segments in either apical view. Eac
h patient was studied with the use of fundamental (F), harmonic (H), fundam
ental + Optison (F + O), and H + O techniques, with standard long-axis, sho
rt-axis, and apical 4- and 2-chamber views. Intravenous Optison (0-5 to 1.5
mL) was given before F + O and H + O imaging. There were no contrast-relat
ed side effects noted. All images were stored digitally in a quad-screen fo
rmat. For each set of images, segments (n = 22) were given an endocardial b
order visualization score of 0 if not visualized, I if visualized in either
systole or diastole, and 2 if visualized in both. There was stepwise impro
vement in endocardial border visualization, with mean endocardial border vi
sualization score of 1.09 +/- 0.83 (F), 1.33 +/- 0.81 (H), 1.64 +/- 0.62 (F
+ O), and 1.90 +/- 0.35 (H + O). There was a statistically significant dif
ference between each group (P < .001). The incremental benefit of Optison w
as greater with harmonic imaging than with fundamental (P < .001). The use
of Optison is safe and effective in the intensive care unit. In combination
with harmonic imaging, contrast provides maximal endocardial border deline
ation during echocardiographic imaging of technically difficult patients in
the intensive care unit.