The extent and nature of lawyers' participation in civic life probably has
important effects on the character of the community's activity and its outc
omes. Where and how lawyers participate in voluntary associations may influ
ence the ability of those organizations to function within the larger struc
ture of American institutions.
This paper compares findings from two surveys of Chicago lawyers, the first
conducted in 1975 and the second in 1994-95. Contrary to some expectations
, the available evidence does not suggest that community activities of lawy
ers decreased, Moreover, lawyers' energies in 1995 appear to have been devo
ted more often to socially concerned organizations, those with a reformist
agenda, than had been the case in 1975. The types of organizations with the
greatest increase in activity were religious and civic associations. A sma
ller percentage of the respondents held leadership positions in 1995 than i
n 1975, but, because of a doubling in the number of lawyers, the best estim
ate is that the bar's absolute level of contribution to community leadershi
p did not change greatly.
In both 1975 and 1995, a hierarchy of social prestige appears to have influ
enced the pattern of lawyers' community activities. Lawyers who had higher
incomes, were middle-aged, were Protestants, and who had attended elite law
schools were more likely to be active or leaders in most kinds of organiza
tions. In ethnic and fraternal organizations, however, the elites of the pr
ofession had relatively low rates of participation, while government lawyer
s, solo practitioners, and graduates of less prestigious law schools predom
inated. Status hierarchies within the broader community-as well as social d
ifferences in taste, preference, or "culture" -clearly penetrate the bar.