Comparative effects of the novel vasotocin analogue F-180 vs. vasopressin and terlipressin on systemic and splanchnic isolated vessels from portal hypertensive rats
Mc. Ramirez et al., Comparative effects of the novel vasotocin analogue F-180 vs. vasopressin and terlipressin on systemic and splanchnic isolated vessels from portal hypertensive rats, N-S ARCH PH, 364(3), 2001, pp. 199-204
F-180 has been proposed as a new vasopressin analogue for the treatment of
portal hypertension. This study investigates the contractile profile of F-1
80 compared to vasopressin and its analogue terlipressin on isolated system
ic and splanchnic vessels from sham-operated and partial portal vein ligate
d (PPVL) rats. F-180 (10(-9) -10(-6) M), vasopressin (10(-11)-10(-8) M) and
terlipressin (10(-9) -10(-4) M) induced contraction of the mesenteric vein
, aorta, iliac, tail and mesenteric arteries. The order of potency in these
vessels was vasopressin (pD(2) similar to9) > F- 180 (pD(2) similar to8) >
terlipressin (pD(2) similar to6). Significant (P <0.01) differences betwee
n sham-operated and PPVL rats were noticed exclusively in the mesenteric ve
in, being the maximal effect of the three agonists at least twice greater i
n PPVL rats than in sham-operated rats. The order of sensitivity to the vas
oconstrictors in vessels from PPVL rats was aorta < mesenteric artery < ili
ac artery congruent to tail artery congruent to mesenteric vein. The contra
ctile profile of these peptides in each vessel from PPVL animals was quite
similar, except in the mesenteric vein and the aorta. F- 180 showed higher
efficacy (P <0.01) than terlipressin in the mesenteric vein and lower (P <0
.05) efficacy than vasopressin in the aorta. These findings suggest the exi
stence of a vasoconstrictor territorial selectivity for vasopressin and its
analogues, which could justify the efficacy of these drugs in portal hyper
tension therapy. In particular, F-180 appears to be a viable alternative to
the classic vasopressin analogues.