Background: Although the use of race and ethnicity as variables in research
has increased over the past five decades, there is confusion regarding the
meaning of the terms, as well as how the words are defined and determined
in scientific inquiry.
Objective: To review the use of race and ethnicity as variables in nursing
research literature.
Methods: Original research articles published in Nursing Research in the ye
ars, 1952, 1955, and every 5 years thereafter through 2000 were reviewed. T
hose articles describing human characteristics (N = 337) were analyzed for
content concerning: (a) frequency of racial and ethnic terms, (b) words use
d for racial and ethnic categories, (c) definitions of racial and ethnic te
rms, and (d) how a study participant's race or ethnicity was determined.
Results: Racial and ethnic variables were mentioned in 167 of the 337 revie
wed articles. Eighty-one terms and word phrases were used for these variabl
es. In only five articles were the variables defined. Race and ethnic label
s were often intermixed and the majority of studies provided no information
about how categorization of the participant's race or ethnicity was made.
In addition, there was relatively little growth in the number of studies th
at had racial/ethnic groups, other than Whites, as the majority of the samp
le.
Conclusion: Racial and ethnic variables provide nurse researchers with many
challenges. Although race and ethnicity were widely used in Nursing Resear
ch articles, the categories were not defined in the majority of papers, and
methods used to determine a participant's race or ethnicity were unclear.
In order to construct a common and consistent understanding of racial and e
thnic categories, nurse researchers should be explicit regarding the ration
ale related to their use of the categories and the assumptions underlying p
articular racial and ethnic categorizations.