Enhanced detection criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Sensitivity and specificity of the stability algorithm at different heart rates
K. Kettering et al., Enhanced detection criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Sensitivity and specificity of the stability algorithm at different heart rates, PACE, 24(9), 2001, pp. 1325-1333
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The lack of specificity in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias re
mains a major clinical problem in the therapy with ICDs. The stability crit
erion has been shown to be useful in discriminating ventricular tachyarrhyt
hmias characterized by a small variation in cycle lengths from AF with rapi
d ventricular response presenting a higher degree of variability of RR inte
rvals. But RR variability decreases with increasing heart rate during AF. T
herefore, the aim of the study was to determine if the sensitivity and spec
ificity of the STABILITY algorithm for spontaneous tachyarrhythmias is rela
ted to ventricular rate, Forty-two patients who had received an ICD (CPI Ve
ntak Mini I, II, III or Ventak AV) were enrolled in the study. Two hundred
ninety-eight episodes of AF with rapid ventricular response and 817 episode
s of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificit
y in the detection of ventricular tachyarrhythmias were calculated at diffe
rent heart rates. When a stability value of 30 ms was programmed the result
was a sensitivity of 82.7% and a specificity of 91.4% in the detection of
slow ventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate < 150 beats/min). When faster
ventricular tachyarrhythmias with rates between 150 and 169 beats/min (170
-189 beats/min) were analyzed, a stability value of 30 ms provided a sensit
ivity of 94.5% (94.7%) and a specificity of 76.5% (54.0%). For arrhythmia e
pisodes greater than or equal to 190 beats/min, the same stability value re
sulted in a sensitivity of 78.2% and a specificity of 41.0%. Even when othe
r stability values were taken into consideration, no acceptable sensitivity
/specificity values could be obtained in this subgroup. RR variability decr
eases with increasing heart rate during AF while RR variability remains alm
ost constant at different cycle lengths during ventricular tachyarrhythmias
. Thus, acceptable performance of the STABILITY algorithm appears to be lim
ited to ventricular rate zones < 170 beats/min.