Jd. Van Horn et al., The Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Center (fMRIDC): the challenges and rewards of large-scale databasing of neuroimaging studies, PHI T ROY B, 356(1412), 2001, pp. 1323-1339
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Experimental Biology
Journal title
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
The Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Center (fMRIDC) (http://www.
fmridc.org) was established in the Autumn of 1999 with the objective of cre
ating a mechanism by which members of the neuroscientific community may mor
e easily share functional neuroimaging data. Examples in other sciences off
er proof of the usefulness and benefit that sharing data provides through e
ncouraging growth and development in those fields. By building a publicly a
ccessible repository of raw data from peer-reviewed studies, the Data Cente
r hopes to create a similarly successful environment for the neurosciences.
In this article, we discuss the continuum of data-sharing efforts and provi
de an overview of the scientific and practical difficulties inherent in man
aging various fMLRI data-sharing approaches. Next, we detail the organizati
on, design and foundation of the fMRIDC, ranging from its current capabilit
ies to the issues involved in the submitting and requesting of data. We dis
cuss how a publicly accessible database enables other fields to develop rel
evant tools that can aid in the growth of understanding of cognitive proces
ses. Information retrieval and meta-analytic techniques can be used to sear
ch, sort and categorize study information with a view towards subjecting st
udy data to secondary 'meta-' and 'mega-analyses'. In addition, we detail t
he technical and policy challenges that have had to be addressed in the for
mation of the Data Center. Among others, these include: human subject confi
dentiality issues; ensuring investigator's rights; heterogeneous data descr
iption and organization; development of search tools; and data transfer iss
ues. We conclude with comments concerning the future of the fMRIDC effort,
its role in promoting the sharing of neuroscientific data, and how this may
alter the manner in which studies are published.