In this essay I interpret land-access strategies on the mid- twentieth-cent
ury Brazilian frontier as the result of local usufruct-based labour relatio
ns that manipulated regionally-interpreted land law. Political ecology, New
Institutional Economics and bureaucratic institutions literatures inform m
y labour-law approach to examine how land-tenure regimes are created, contr
olled and maintained. The microeconomics of two labour systems, contractual
claim-staking (the preposto system) and share-tenant farming, reduced the
transaction costs involved in land claiming, while capitalising on informat
ion asymmetries between workers and land claimants. In several instances co
ercion was a key element in mobilising labour to create judicially relevant
evidence of possession and generate significant rent streams. Land law did
not demand such labour relations, but its contradictions encouraged claima
nts to use prepostos and share-tenant farmers to produce secure land access
. This argument supports the notion, developed within political ecology, th
at local conditions (labour relations and uneven geographical information)
mediate the influence of regional factors (interpretation and enforcement o
f land law). While adopting some concepts from the New Institutional Econom
ics, the argument rejects the claim that land title determines land use and
other economic behaviour. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserv
ed.