Following Behn's observation that scientists in other fields understand the
big questions of their disciplines and focus attention and their discussio
ns on those questions, public administration scholars have attempted to ide
ntify the "big questions" in public management and public administration. I
n this article, I suggest that scholars in public administration should als
o be attentive to the big questions of public administration education, tho
se timeless and enduring concerns that speak to the basic perspectives that
we bring to the educational process. Specifically, I identify four big que
stions: Do we seek to educate our students with respect to theory or to pra
ctice? Do we prepare students for their first jobs or for those to which th
ey might aspire later? What are the appropriate delivery mechanisms for MPA
courses and curricula? What personal commitments do we make as public admi
nistration educators? I argue that these big questions in public administra
tion education are far more connected than we usually think, and by posing
these questions in terms of processes of human development we can at least
provide a framework through which we might develop more coherent answers to
these big questions, answers that recognize and build on the diversity of
our students and our faculty.