This article looks at an old subject (the state of the state) under new con
ditions (accelerating globalization and fragmentation), using Canada as the
case in point.
My first concern is linguistic: such labels as 'post-Keynesian', 'post-welf
are', and even 'post-national' tell us more about what the state may have b
een than what it has become. These 'post-' categories do not capture the ex
tent to which governmental functions have been redistributed - upward to in
ternational institutions, downward to sub-national states, and laterally to
the private sector. Nor do they direct our attention to the dynamic interc
onnections that are linking evolving governmental forms with civil society.
I go on to consider to what extent these difficulties can be resolved by co
nsidering the 'state' as a nested, multi-tiered set of institutions providi
ng governance on five levels - from the municipal and the regional, through
the national to the continental and global. Political economy analysis of
the dynamic that links these levels of governance with civil society and tr
ansnational market forces may tell us better than the post-it labels that t
he present capability of the Canadian, or any other, state is less bleak th
an it may have seemed.