S1 screw bending moment with posterior spinal instrumentation across the lumbosacral junction after unilateral iliac crest harvest

Citation
Gm. Alegre et al., S1 screw bending moment with posterior spinal instrumentation across the lumbosacral junction after unilateral iliac crest harvest, SPINE, 26(18), 2001, pp. 1950-1955
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
18
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1950 - 1955
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20010915)26:18<1950:SSBMWP>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Study Design. A biomechanical study comparing fixation across the lumbosacr al junction. Objectives. To determine which long posterior construct across the lumbosac ral junction produces the least bending moment on the S1 screw when only on e ilium is available for fixation. Summary of Background Data. Recent in vitro studies have demonstrated the b enefit of anterior support and fixation into the ilium when instrumenting a long posterior construct across the lumbosacral junction. Methods. Four L2-sacrum constructs were tested on six synthetic models of t he lumbar spine and pelvis simulating that the right ilium had been harvest ed. Construct 1: L2-S1 bilateral screws. Construct 2: L2-S1 + left iliac bo lt. Construct 3: L2-S1 + left iliac bolt + right S2 screw. Construct 4: L2- S1 + bilateral S2 screws. The four constructs were then retested with an an terior L5-S1 strut. A flexion-extension moment was applied across each cons truct, and the moment at the left and right S1 pedicle screw was measured w ith internal strain gauges. Results. Iliac bolt fixation was found to significantly decrease the flexio n- extension moment on the ipsilateral S1 screw by 70% and the contralatera l screw by 26%. An anterior L5-S1 strut significantly decreased the S1 scre w flexion- extension moment by 33%. Anterior support at L5-S1 provided no s tatistical decrease in the flexion-extension moment when bilateral posterio r fixation beyond S1 was present with either a unilateral iliac bolt and co ntralateral S2 screw, or bilateral S2 screws. Conclusions. There is a significant decrease in the flexion-extension momen t on the S1 screw when extending long posterior constructs to either the il ium or S2 sacral screw. There is no biomechanical advantage of the iliac bo lt over the S2 screw in decreasing the moment on the S1 screw in flexion an d extension. Adding anterior support to long posterior constructs significa ntly decreases the moment on the S1 screw. Adding distal posterior fixation to either the ilium or S2 decreases the moment on S1 screws more than addi ng anterior support. Further, adding anterior support when bilateral distal fixation past S1 is already present does not significantly decrease the mo ment on the S1 screws in flexion and extension.