Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel nodebiopsy for breast cancer

Citation
Rcg. Martin et al., Intradermal isotope injection is superior to intramammary in sentinel nodebiopsy for breast cancer, SURGERY, 130(3), 2001, pp. 432-438
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
SURGERY
ISSN journal
00396060 → ACNP
Volume
130
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
432 - 438
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(200109)130:3<432:IIIIST>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Background. The optimal sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique remains undefined in breast cancer Injecting radiotracer or blue dye by a variety o f routes seems to stage the axilla with comparable accuracy, and we have hy pothesized that the dermal and the parenchymal lymphatics of the breast dra in to the same SLN in most patients. Two previous studies from our institut ion support this concept: (1) a single-surgeon series of 200 consecutive SL N biopsy procedures demonstrating a high dye-isotope concordance for both i ntradermal (ID) and intraparenchymal (IP) isotope injection, and (2) a seri es of 100 procedures validated by a backup axillary dissection (ALND) in wh ich the false-negative rate following ID isotope injection was comparable t o that of our previous results with IP injection. Here, we directly compare the results of SLN biopsy using either ID or IP isotope injection for our entire experience of SLN biopsy procedures in which a backup ALND was done. Methods. This is a retrospective, nonrandomized study of 298 clinical stage I to II breast cancer patients having SLN biopsy with a backup ALND planne d in advance, comparing the results of ID (n = 164) and IP (n = 134) isotop e injection. All patients had IP injection of blue dye. Endpoints included (1) successful SLN identification, (2) false-negative rate, (3) dye-isotope concordance, and (4) the SLN/axillary background isotope count ratio. Results. ID isotope was more successful than IP, identifying the SLN in 98 % versus 89 % of cases, respectively. False-negative results (4.8 % vs 4.4 %) and dye-isotope concordance (92 % vs 93 %) were comparable between the 2 groups, and SLN/axillary background isotope count ratios were significantl y higher with ID than with IP injection (288/1 vs 59/1). Conclusions. ID isotope injection identifies the SLN more often than IP, st ages the axilla with comparable accuracy, and is associated with higher Lev els of SLN isotope uptake. The dermal and parenchymal lymphatics of the bre ast drain to the same axillary SLN in most breast cancer patients, and ID i sotope injection is the procedure of choice in this setting.