Py. Robillard et al., Evaluation of neonatal sepsis screening in a tropical area part III: Neonatal sepsis in meconium stained deliveries, W I MED J, 50(2), 2001, pp. 130-132
Of the 6,060 consecutive live births delivered at the University, Maternity
Unit of Guadeloupe (French West Indies) during a 30-month period, 635 newb
orns (10.4%) presented with meconium stained (MS) amniotic fluid, of which
595 (94%) received bacteriological screening at birth (light MS, n=543; thi
ck MS, n=52). Thirty, (5%) of MS newborns had a bacteraemia (n=13, group B
streptococcus, GBS), and 128 (21.5%) a bacterial positive gastric aspirate
(n=54, GBS). Sixty-six newborns among Ms babies needed tracheal suctioning
(11%) in the delivery room for meconium inhalation. Among these 595 screene
d MS newborns, 286 (48%) presented clinical signs of postmaturity, at birth
, having therefore an explanation for their MS condition. For the other MS
newborns without the postmaturity explanation, we experienced twofold incre
ased risk of neonatal sepsis (OR 1.88 for bacteraemia and 2.61 for external
carriage p < 0.02, Chi square) as compared with their MS postmature counte
rparts. We conclude that when meconium stained deliveries are associated wi
th postmaturity, signs, one may not need to initiate prophylactic antibioti
c treatment at birth unless they present with other traditional risk factor
s for neonatal sepsis such as intrapartum fever and prolonged rupture of me
mbranes.