J. Lah et al., Thermodynamics of berenil binding to poly[d(AT)]center dot poly[d(AT)] andpoly[d(A)]center dot poly[d(T)] duplexes, ACTA CHIM S, 48(3), 2001, pp. 289-308
Thermodynamics of berenil binding to poly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)] and poly[d(A)]
.poly[d(T)] duplexes in neutral buffer solutions was studied using a combin
ation of calorimetric and spectroscopic techniques. By titration calorimetr
y we found that at 25 degreesC the enthalpies of berenil binding to poly[d(
AT)].poly[d(AT)] and poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)] are -20.4 and 10.3 kJ/mol of bou
nd drug, respectively. Our CD results show that berenil binding to both dup
lexes is at low berenil/DNA ratios slightly positively cooperative whereas
at higher binding densities it is characterized by a constant affinity and
a binding site size, n, of 4 base pairs/berenil molecule. Berenil binding t
o both polynucleotides was also followed by performing UV titrations of ber
enil solutions with DNA solutions at 25 degreesC and by measuring the UV me
lting curves at different berenil/DNA molar ratios. From Scatchard plots th
e best fit of experimental data with the predictions of the neighbor exclus
ion model was obtained with K = 1.3.10(7) and n = 3.5 for poly[d(AT)].poly[
d(AT)] and K = 1.5.10(7) and n = 3.8 for poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)]. UV melting
experiments showed for both polynucleotides that above their saturation wit
h bound berenil they exhibit monophasic melting accompanied by a large incr
ease in T-m, whereas at low drug/base pair ratios their melting is biphasic
. Berenil binding constants determined at 25 degreesC using the T-m data an
d the neighbor exclusion model are K = 2.3.10(7) for poly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)
] and K = 7.4.10(6) for poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)]. From these K values the stan
dard free energies of binding were determined and combined with the measure
d enthalpies of binding to obtain the corresponding entropies of binding. T
he resulting thermodynamic binding profiles show that berenil binding to po
ly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)] is governed by about equal enthalpic and entropic for
ces whereas its binding to poly[d(A)].poly[d(T)] is overwhelmingly entropy
driven.