Barabasz, Barabasz, Jensen, Calvin, Trevisan, and Warner (1999) showed that
, when subjects are stringently selected for hypnotizability and responses
are time locked to events, robust markers of hypnotic responding emerge tha
t reflect alterations in consciousness that correspond to subjects' subject
ive experiences of perceptual alteration. To further test the Barabasz et a
l. (1999) hypothesis, we obtained EEG visual P300 event-related potentials
(ERPs) from 20 high- and low-hypnotizable subjects. The effects of positive
obstructive and negative CI obliterating instructions were tested during w
aking and alert hypnotic conditions. High-hypnotizables showed greater ERP
amplitudes in response to the negative hallucination condition and lower ER
P amplitudes in response to the positive obstructive hallucination when com
pared to the low-hypnotizables. Contrary to socio-psychological or role pla
y conceptualizations, the hypnotic induction resulted in specific psychophy
siological responses which could not be produced by waking imagination or b
y the lows who were trying to mimic hypnotic responding.