Comparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate
J. Lewis et al., Comparison of cross-sectional renal function measurements in African Americans with hypertensive nephrosclerosis and of primary formulas to estimate glomerular filtration rate, AM J KIDNEY, 38(4), 2001, pp. 744-753
Renal function measurements were obtained in 1,703 African Americans with p
resumed hypertensive nephrosclerosis who were screened for entry into the A
frican-American Study of Hypertension and Kidney Disease (AASK). We examine
d the effect of race on relationships involving renal variables by comparin
g African Americans enrolled into the AASK with non-African Americans enrol
led into the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study. We examine
d the effect of gender on renal variables by comparing African American men
and women. We compared various methods for estimating glomerular filtratio
n rate (GFR) with iodine 125-labeled (I-125)-iothalamate GFR. AASK data wer
e also used to derive a new formula for estimating GFR in African Americans
. After adjusting for age, sex, and baseline GFR, African American patients
on the AASK study were heavier and had larger body surface areas and body
mass indices than either MDRD African Americans or non-African Americans. A
frican Americans had greater serum creatinine levels and urinary creatinine
excretions for any given level of GFR. Mean GFR was greater in African Ame
rican men than African American women (59.7 versus 51.7 mL/min/1.73 m(2)),
although serum creatinine levels were also greater in men (1.91 versus 1.73
mg/dL). Seventy-eight percent of women with serum creatinine levels betwee
n 1.2 and 1.5 mg/dL had GFRs less than 65 mL/min/1.73 m(2). For African Ame
ricans in the AASK, GFR was overestimated by the 24-hour creatinine clearan
ce and underestimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula. A prediction formula
developed in the MDRD study more accurately predicted GFR in AASK patients
than these measurements. AASK data were also used to derive a new five-term
formula for estimating GFR that was slightly more accurate in the African
Americans in the AASK than the MDRD formula (median percentage of error, 12
.4% for the MDRD formula versus 12.1% for the AASK formula). Important diff
erences exist in renal variables between African Americans and non-African
Americans and between African American men and African American women. Form
ulas using demographic data and readily measured serum values estimate I-12
5-iothalamate GFR. (C) 2001 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.