Numerical analysis of grassland bacterial community structure under different land management regimens by using 16S ribosomal DNA sequence data and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis banding patterns
Ae. Mccaig et al., Numerical analysis of grassland bacterial community structure under different land management regimens by using 16S ribosomal DNA sequence data and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis banding patterns, APPL ENVIR, 67(10), 2001, pp. 4554-4559
Bacterial diversity in unimproved and improved grassland soils was assessed
by PCR amplification of bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) from directly e
xtracted soil DNA, followed by sequencing of similar to 45 16S rDNA clones
from each of three unimproved and three improved grassland samples (A. E. M
cCaig, L. A. Glover, and J. I. Prosser, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1721-1
730, 1999) or by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of total am
plification products. Semi-improved grassland soils were analyzed only by D
GGE. No differences between communities were detected by calculation of div
ersity indices and similarity coefficients for clone data (possibly due to
poor coverage). Differences were not observed between the diversities of in
dividual unimproved and improved grassland DGGE profiles, although consider
able spatial variation was observed among triplicate samples. Semi-improved
grassland samples, however, were less diverse than the other grassland sam
ples and had much lower within-group variation. DGGE banding profiles obtai
ned from triplicate samples pooled prior to analysis indicated that there w
as less evenness in improved soils, suggesting that selection for specific
bacterial groups occurred. Analysis of DGGE profiles by canonical variate a
nalysis but not by principal-coordinate analysis, using unweighted data (co
nsidering only the presence and absence of bands) and weighted data (consid
ering the relative intensity of each band), demonstrated that there were cl
ear differences between grasslands, and the results were not affected by we
ighting of data. This study demonstrated that quantitative analysis of data
obtained by community profiling methods, such as DGGE, can reveal differen
ces between complex microbial communities.