This paper concludes that a market for state-contingent claims (UK horserac
e betting) displays evidence of pervasive but heterogeneous forms of ineffi
ciency, in significant contrast to earlier investigations. Using hitherto u
navailable data, comparison of notional returns implicit in parallel sets o
f bookmaker and parimutuel odds identifies inefficiency in terms of zones o
f distinct but contrasting forms of cross-market returns differential. The
inefficiency is rationalized in terms of both buyer and supplier behaviour;
its durability is explained in terms of limited arbitrage opportunities.