Study objective: Electrocardiographic abnormalities are common after t
ransthoracic defibrillation. ECG ST-segment changes are especially pro
blematic after defibrillation and may indicate ischemic or shock-induc
ed cardiac dysfunction after resuscitation. Biphasic defibrillation wa
veforms, compared with monophasic waveforms, diminish shock-induced ca
rdiac dysfunction in laboratory preparations. This effect has not been
validated in human subjects. We therefore evaluated in a prospective,
blinded fashion the effect of biphasic and monophasic transthoracic d
efibrillation on the ECG ST segment in 30 consecutive patients during
surgery for the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator. Methods:
In each patient two low-energy truncated biphasic transthoracic defib
rillation shocks (115 and 130 J) were compared with a standard clinica
l 200 J monophasic damped-sine wave shock. The biphasic shocks and the
damped-sine wave shock have been demonstrated to have equal defibrill
ation efficacy of 97%. Fifteen-second ECG signals recorded across tran
sthoracic defibrillation electrodes were digitized before ventricular
fibrillation induction and immediately after each defibrillation attem
pt. The ST segments 80 msec after the J point were analyzed in a blind
ed fashion by two reviewers. The ST-segment deflection, QRS-interval d
uration, QT interval, and heart rate after each therapy were compared
with baseline values. Results: ECG ST-segment elevation was significan
tly greater with the 200-J damped-sine waveform than with either bipha
sic waveform. The ECG ST-segment levels were -.55+/-.36 at baseline, .
76+/-.36 mm after internal shock, -.02-.36 mm after 115-J biphasic sho
ck, .21+/-.38 mm after 130-J biphasic shock, and 2.09+/-.37 mm after 2
00-J damped-sine wave shock (P<.0001). QRS-interval duration, QT inter
val, and heart rate did not change significantly with any waveform. Co
nclusion: Transthoracic defibrillation with biphasic waveforms results
in less postshock ECG evidence of myocardial dysfunction (injury or i
schemia) than standard monophasic damped sine waveforms without compro
mise of defibrillation efficacy.