When samples of psychiatric patients are assessed on 2 occasions on state a
nd trait measures, without any formal intervention having yet taken place,
a mean change in scores towards less psychopathology is often observed. Thi
s re-test effect, which is a potential threat to the validity of longitudin
al studies, has not been given serious attention by researchers using repea
ted administrations. The present study addressed this issue by examining re
-test effects in 2 independent clinical samples with the Symptom Check List
-90-Revised and other widely-used state and trait measures. Time intervals
between intake and re-take were 3 months and 11-350 days (M=93 days, median
=81 days). Results indicated that the re-test effect occurred for most of t
he measures. Where significant testing effects were observed, 54-72% of the
patients had time 2 scores that were lower than the average time 1 scores.
The importance and practical and scientific implications of the findings a
re discussed. Eleven hypotheses concerning the nature of the re-test effect
are offered, including mood-congruent associative processing, natural copi
ng mechanisms, self-monitoring hypothesis and response-shift. (C) 2001 Else
vier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.