Objectives. Intrusive memories of extreme trauma can disrupt a stepwise app
roach to imaginal exposure. Concurrent tasks that load the visuospatial ske
tchpad (VSSP) of working memory reduce the vividness of recalled images. Th
is study tested whether relief of distress from competing VSSP tasks during
imaginal exposure is at the cost of impaired desensitization.
Design. This study examined repeated exposure to emotive memories using 18
unselected undergraduates and a within-subjects design with three exposure
conditions (Eye Movement, Visual Noise, Exposure Alone) in random, counterb
alanced order.
Method. At baseline, participants recalled positive and negative experience
s, and rated the vividness and emotiveness of each image. A different posit
ive and negative recollection was then used for each condition. Vividness a
nd emotiveness were rated after each of eight exposure trials. At a post-ex
posure session 1 week later, participants rated each image without any conc
urrent task.
Results. Consistent with previous research, vividness and distress during i
maging were lower during Eye Movements than in Exposure Alone, with passive
visual interference giving intermediate results. A reduction in emotional
responses from Baseline to Post was of similar size for the three condition
s.
Conclusion. Visuospatial tasks may offer a temporary response aid for imagi
nal exposure without affecting desensitization.