The Conners' Parent Rating Scales (CPRS) have undergone a considerable amou
nt of scrutiny-and subsequent refining, reshaping, and revising since their
development in 1970. While such longitudinal scrutiny has ultimately led t
o a more reliable, valid assessment tool, it has left behind a wake of lite
rature filled with misinformation and ambiguity. Multiple versions of the C
onners' Rating Scales (CRS), their misuse, and inaccurate reporting by rese
archers have created a body of literature that is difficult to interpret an
d misleading to both researchers and clinicians. This review is aimed at cl
arifying issues regarding the proper use of the CPRS as both a diagnostic i
nstrument and a research tool. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights re
served.