Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study

Citation
N. Bent et al., Factors determining participation in young adults with a physical disability: a pilot study, CLIN REHAB, 15(5), 2001, pp. 552-561
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL REHABILITATION
ISSN journal
02692155 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
552 - 561
Database
ISI
SICI code
0269-2155(200110)15:5<552:FDPIYA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate in a pilot study the usefulness of measures of heal th and psychosocial status for use with young people with physical and comp lex disability. Also to test empirically a conceptual model of the factors determining key outcomes in young disabled adults, in particular, participa tion (handicap). Design: A cross-sectional study involving face-to-face interviews with youn g adults aged 16-28 years (n = 45) with physical and complex disabilities. A group of nondisabled college students completed the same set of questions to provide normative scores for some psychosocial measures. Setting: Young people with physical disabilities were recruited from the ar ea of North and North East Lincolnshire, and nondisabled young people from the Leeds area. Methods: Standardized measures of impairment, disability and handicap, toge ther with various psychosocial scales were incorporated into a structured f ace-to-face interview. Standardized measures included the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Barthel Index, the London Handicap Scale, Rosenberg's S elf-esteem Scale and the Proactive Scale. Results: Regression analysis showed the most important predictors of partic ipation were energy and pain (NHP), disability (Barthel) and self-efficacy. Most of the health status measures were able to discriminate between disab led and nondisabled young people, but some measures lacked face validity fo r the 'nonwalking' disabled group. Conclusions: Both health status and psychosocial factors were found to impa ct on the participation of young people. Impairment and disability however, did not impact adversely on self-ratings of health or quality of life and it is clear from these results that having a disability may limit participa tion, but is not necessarily synonymous with a poorer quality of life.