Historical discourse has become an important aspect of post-Suharto Indones
ian politics. The nationalist instrumentalization of the past, always stron
g in Indonesia, took on a martial aspect under the New Order. Even today, t
he establishment remains reluctant to abandon it. But new visions of histor
y have arisen out of the widespread protests against the New Order. Some pr
eserve the form of a martial nationalist historiography, but displace it to
the regions (especially Aceh and Papua), thus turning it against Jakarta.
Others, both at a national and a local level, embrace more societal histori
ographies in which the state and national unity are not idealized, and in w
hich internal conflict is not taboo.