Projects promoting community-based management of natural resources frequent
ly encourage local smallholders to share flora, fauna, or land forms with s
tate agencies and/or private companies. Ideals of common property and moral
economy have inspired this agenda and helped spread it globally. In Southe
rn Africa, however, the general model of shared landscapes has collided wit
h a bitter history of white colonization and land grabbing. This article re
counts the rise and fall of one CAMPFIRE (Communal Areas Management Program
me for Indigenous Resources) project in eastern Zimbabwe. There, cadastral
politics - struggles over the bounding and control of land - overwhelmed ne
gotiations for joint management and eco-tourism. Across the border, in Moza
mbique, community-based resource management has engaged with cadastral poli
tics in a more fruitful fashion. In the midst of latter-day Afrikaner colon
ization, this project mapped smallholders' claims to land. Thus, the Zimbab
wean project ignored territorial conflict and ultimately succumbed to it. T
he Mozambican project jumped into the fray, with some success. On past or c
urrent settler frontiers, community-based management may learn from this le
sson: dispense with an ideology of sharing and join the rough-and-tumble of
cadastral politics.