Repaglinide, a carbamoylmethyl benzoic acid derivative, is the first of a n
ew class of oral antidiabetic agents designed to normalise postprandial glu
cose excursions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Like the sulphon
ylureas, repaglinide reduces blood glucose by stimulating insulin release f
rom pancreatic beta -cells, but differs from these and other antidiabetic a
gents in its structure, binding profile, duration of action and mode of exc
retion.
In clinical trials of up to 1-year's duration, repaglinide maintained or im
proved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In comp
arative, 1-year, double-blind, randomised trials (n = 256 to 544), patients
receiving repaglinide (0.5 to 4mg before 3 daily meals) achieved similar g
lycaemic control to that in patients receiving glibenclamide (glyburide) le
ss than or equal to 15 mg/day and greater control than patients receiving g
lipizide less than or equal to 15 mg/day. Changes from baseline in glycosyl
ated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels were similar between pati
ents receiving repaglinide and glibenclamide in all studies; however, repag
linide was slightly better than glibenclamide in reducing postprandial bloo
d glucose in 1 short term study (n = 192).
Patients can vary their meat timetable with repaglinide: the glucose-loweri
ng efficacy of repaglinide was similar for patients consuming 2, 3 or 4 mea
ls a day. Repaglinide showed additive effects when used in combination with
other oral antidiabetic agents including metformin, troglitazone, rosiglit
azone and pioglitazone, and intermediate-acting insulin (NPH) given at bedt
ime.
In 1-year trials, the most common adverse events reported in repaglinide re
cipients (n = 1228) were hypoglycaemia (16%), upper respiratory tract infec
tion (10%), rhinitis (7%), bronchitis (6%) and headache (9%). The overall i
ncidence of hypoglycaemia was similar to that recorded in patients receivin
g glibenclamide, glipizide or gliclazide (n = 597) [18%]; however, the inci
dence of serious hypoglycaemia appears to be slightly higher in sulphonylur
ea recipients. Unlike glibenclamide, the risk of hypoglycaemia in patients
receiving repaglinide was not increased when a meal was missed in 1 trial.
In conclusion, repaglinide is a useful addition to the other currently avai
lable treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Preprandial. repaglinide has
displayed antihyperglycaemic efficacy at least equal to that of various su
lphonylureas and is associated with a reduced risk of serious hypoglycaemia
. It is well tolerated in a wide range of patients, including the elderly,
even if a meal is missed. Furthermore, glycaemic control is improved when r
epaglinide is used in combination with metformin. Thus, repaglinide should
be considered for use in any patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose bl
ood glucose cannot be controlled by diet or exercise alone, or as an adjunc
t in patients whose glucose levels are inadequately controlled on metformin
alone.