We examined cardiovascular responses indicating challenge and threat during
social comparisons. Experiment I manipulated comparison direction (i.e. up
ward/downward) within a cooperative social interaction, during which we mea
sured cardiovascular responses, evaluations of demands and resources, and s
elf-reports. Participants interacting with upward comparison partners evalu
ated the task as more 'threatening' (demands relative to resources) than pa
rticipants cooperating with downward comparison partners. Moreover, partici
pants cooperating with upward comparison partners exhibited cardiovascular
reactivity consistent with threat (i.e. increased ventricle contractility,
no changes in cardiac output, and vasoconstriction). In contrast, participa
nts interacting with downward comparison partners exhibited challenge respo
nses (i.e. increased contractility, increased cardiac output, and vasodilat
ion). This basic finding was extended in Experiment 2 with the examination
of a classic moderator of social comparison, attitudinal similarity, of the
comparison partner Participants paired with attitudinally dissimilar partn
ers exhibited exacerbated reactions relative to participants paired with at
titudinally similar partners. That is, relative to similar partners, dissim
ilar partners engendered greater threat responses during upward comparisons
and a tendency toward greater challenge responses during downward comparis
ons. These results are discussed within an assimilative/contrast model of s
ocial comparisons. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.