Phenotypic variation, measured as the coefficient of variation (CV), is usu
ally larger in secondary sexual characters than in ordinary morphological t
raits. We tested if intraspecific differences in the CV between ornamental
and non-ornamental feather traits in 67 evolutionary events of feather orna
mentation in birds were due to differences in (1) the allometric pattern (s
lope of the regression line when regressing trait size on an indicator of b
ody size), or (2) the dispersion of observations around the regression line
. We found that only dispersion of observations around the regression line
contributed significantly to total variation. A large dispersion of observa
tions around the regression line for ornamental feathers is consistent with
these characters showing condition-dependence, supporting indicator models
of sexual selection more strongly than a pure Fisher process. Ornamental f
eathers in males demonstrated negative allometry when regressed on tarsus l
ength, which is a measure of skeletal body size. This finding is consistent
with ornamental feather traits being subject to directional selection due
to female mate preferences, where large body size is less important than in
male-male competition. This pattern of phenotypic variation for avian seco
ndary sexual characters contrasts with patterns of variation for insect gen
italia, supposedly subject to sexual selection, since the latter traits onl
y differ from ordinary morphology traits in allometry coefficient. The prev
ailing regime of selection (directional or stabilizing) and the effects of
environmental factors are proposed to account for these differences among t
raits.