Knowledge of the cost of parasitism and the competitive ability of parasiti
zed larvae is important for understanding the evolution of resistance. We u
sed larvae of two Drosophila species as hosts for two parasitoid species wh
ich differ in their counter-resistance mechanism. Parasitism by Leptopilina
heterotoma leads to a reduction in survival, in contrast to parasitism by
Asobara tabida. This can be explained by L. heterotoma having a counter-def
ence mechanism that actively interferes with the host's immune system. Para
sitized D. melanogaster larvae, which can encapsulate the parasitoid's egg
to some degree, tend to suffer from a slight reduction in competitive abili
ty, as opposed to parasitized D. subobscura larvae, which are unable to mou
nt an immune response to parasitoids. Combined with earlier work, our resul
ts suggest that, in this system, the costs of actual defence are lower than
the costs of maintaining an efficient immune system.